<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Ceph - Tag - Gene.Tech</title>
        <link>https://geneliu.itaghome.win/tags/ceph/</link>
        <description>Ceph - Tag - Gene.Tech</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>gene.liu@live.com (Gene Liu)</managingEditor>
            <webMaster>gene.liu@live.com (Gene Liu)</webMaster><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:57:57 &#43;0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://geneliu.itaghome.win/tags/ceph/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
    <title>Ceph Geo-Replication Models</title>
    <link>https://geneliu.itaghome.win/2020-02-18-ceph-geo-replication-models/</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:57:57 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>gene.liu@live.com (Gene Liu)</author>
    <guid>https://geneliu.itaghome.win/2020-02-18-ceph-geo-replication-models/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Overview</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>
<p>Ceph implements strong consistency between OSDs according to the replication factor, and reliability/availability according to the placement group (CRUSH MAP).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Clusters utilizing cross-site (a)sync will be performance-compromised and require fat, low-latency pipes, which strongly affects the Ceph RADOS protocol (both on RBD and object storage).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>There is no recommendation/solution statement from Ceph upstream (or Red Hat) yet - <a href="https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/Can_Ceph_Support_Multiple_Data_Centers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer ">https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/Can_Ceph_Support_Multiple_Data_Centers</a></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>It sounds like the team is developing/enhancing a &lsquo;real&rsquo; stretch Ceph cluster. (Attachment 2)</p>]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
